HOME | ABOUT US | Speaker | Americans Together | Videos | www.CenterforPluralism.com | Please note that the blog posts include my own articles plus selected articles critical to India's cohesive functioning. My articles are exclusively published at www.TheGhouseDiary.com You can send an email to: MikeGhouseforIndia@gmail.com


Showing posts with label BJP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BJP. Show all posts

Sunday, March 8, 2020

No More 1947; no more 1984; no more 2002; no more 2020



No More 1947; no more 1984; no more 2002; no more 2020

13000 SOS calls made over 4 days of communal violence raging in some parts of Delhi, and no response from 85000 strong Delhi Police force to come to the aid of the victims. The result: 42 lives snuffed out. Over 350 injured. Property worth thousands of crores destroyed. And relationships ruptured, may be, beyond repair.

 Reminds one of 1984 when thousands of Sikhs made frantic calls without any response from police. The result, over 10,000 lost their lives. Hundreds of women were raped. Thousands were injured.

Had the police done their duty in 1984, the barbaric and tragic incident could have been avoided, and precious lives saved.

The pattern was repeated in 2002 when in Gujarat, communal violence erupted taking a heavy toll of life and property. Police even they're preferred to look the other way while the arsonists and perpetrators of violence continued to loot and kill without a finger being raised by the police.

It has happened again, in Delhi where over three to four days, goons went around, beating and killing, damaging property right under the nose of the police. Reports say, at places, police actively connived with the goons.

So, the 1984 and 2002 the pattern was repeated in 2020. Is it a coincidence that the police in Delhi in 1984 and in 2020 conducted itself in a similar fashion as police did in Gujarat in 2002? Are the police all across the country trained that way? Or, is it the dharma of the police to obey, not the law, but those who control political power?
Is it a coincidence that 2002 Gujarat communal violence took place under the duo of Narendra Modi and Amit Shah when they  were Chief Minister and Home Minister respectively of the State, and the 2020 Delhi communal the violence took  place under the same team with one being the Prime Minister and the other being the Home Minister?  It is an interesting coincidence.

However, getting back to the conduct of police in Delhi, it is quite strange that the High Court had to pull up police to move forward in cases of hate speech which surely provoked people into violence. Those who make provocative statements and instigate people to communal violence are guilty of creating conditions of civil war and destabilizing the nation, and as such, should be treated as traitors.

India has suffered enough. Indians have suffered enough from 1947 through 1984 and 2002. Already, another wound has been inflicted in the body of the nation in the form of recent Delhi Communal clashes. Every time there is a communal clash it is a stab in the heart of Mother India. Let those who love Mother India desist from any further crimes against their mother.

Let us pledge today: “No more 1947; no more 1984; no more 2002 and no more 2020.”

Prof. Indrajit s Saluja
Chief Editor The Indian Panorama
Feb 28, 2020






Tuesday, April 23, 2019

Will BJP turn India upside down?

6 Things That May Happen If The BJP Comes Back to Power

If we thought the last five years were bad, we haven’t seen anything yet.

The possibility of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) retaining power following the Lok Sabha election is legitimately frightening for a large section of India’s population as the last five years have seen, among other things, a rise in violence against Muslims and Dalits, crackdown on dissent and civil liberties, high unemploymentpoor economic growth and anti-farmer and anti-worker policies.
To add to these fears, BJP leaders have been dropping hints about the saffron party’s plans on what the next years may look like for the Indian democracy. Based on it, here is a list of 5 things that are likely to happen if the party comes back to power.
1. No more elections, obviously. 
Don’t say BJP MP from Unnao Sakshi Maharaj didn’t warn us. While addressing a gathering of party workers last month, he proudly proclaimed that 2019 election would be the last election of the Indian democracy if Prime Minister Modi wins.
According to the saffron-clad so-called monk, there is an awakening in the country and that “Hindu jag gaya hai (Hindus have awaken)”. He added, “After this (2019) election, there will not be an election in 2024.”
Before you disregard his words as ramblings of a ‘motormouth’, remember that party president Amit Shah had also said that the BJP would be in power for the next 50 years. “We have not come to power for 5-10 years, but at least 50 years. We should move forward with a conviction that in 40-50 years we have to bring major changes in the country through the medium of power,” he had said.
2. Goodbye to the Constitution of India (as you know it), you had a good run
Pankaja Munde, a BJP minister in Maharashtra and the party’s Lok Sabha candidate from Beed, said while addressing a poll rally this week, “This is not a Zilla Parishad, but a Lok Sabha election. Mahamanav Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar wrote the Constitution. We have to change the Constitution, bring new Bills and make some changes.”
constitution of India(Photo: Wikimedia Commons)
If anyone has doubts about what kind of changes she might be referring to, remember that the BJP’s ideological mothership, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, wants India to be a ‘Hindu rashtra’. This blatant disregard for constitutional values finds a friend in BJP’s loud proclamations of Hindu nationalism.
Union Minister for Skill Development Ananth Kumar Hegde has also hinted at dropping the word ‘secular’  from the constitution, “Some people say the Constitution says secular and you must accept it. We will respect the Constitution, but the Constitution has changed several times and it will change in the future too. We are here to change the Constitution and we’ll change it.”
3. Demonetisation Redux
PM Modi demonetised Rs 500 and 1000 notes on November 8, 2016, and the Indian public forced to stand for long hours outside banks and ATMs was the least terrible consequence of it. Reports have suggested that the policy destroyed India’s informal economy, put millions out of a job and resulted in the death of around 100 people.
demonetisationPeople waiting in queue to exchange the demonetised notes
The decision was taken even though the RBI had expressly said that it would do nothing to eradicate black money. And it didn’t since 99.3% of the demonetised notes entered the banking system.
However, the government refuses to acknowledge that the policy has been a failure. There have been allegations that after demonetisation, BJP chief Amit Shah oversaw a large money laundering racket involving top government officials, where black money was exchanged for a commission.
What exactly was the purpose of demonetisation? No one really knows. Earlier this month, Union Minister Suresh Prabhu reiterated that the measure was taken to eradicate black money. “This (demonetisation) was one measure aimed at taking care of black money. I am not going to tell you whether we need one more (round of it),” he said.
If the BJP does implement the policy again, it will come as a shock but not as a surprise.
4. Say hello to legalised child marriage
The ruling party has time and again expressed their desire to restore the worst practices of the Indian society.
BJP leader Gopal Parmar, who was an MLA in Madhya Pradesh before the 2018 assembly election, had referred to the law against child marriage as the ‘18-year disease‘ that causes ‘love jihad’, because the agency and health of young girls can be sacrificed for bigotry.
“Earlier, the elders of the family used to fix marriages in the childhood, and those relations used to last longer,” the erstwhile BJP MLA had said, adding that “Since the government started this ‘18-year disease’, many girls have started eloping as the fever of love jihad has gripped them.”
While he may no longer be a lawmaker, there is another BJP MLA who was elected to office after she promised that she will not let the police take action against child marriages.
While campaigning in Rajasthan’s Pali, now BJP MLA Shobha Chauhan had said, “In your area, when younger girls are getting married, the police arrives. It is very fortunate for all of you that both political and organisational power is with us. If it is at my level, I will take care of it and if it is at the level above mine, then I will get it done from those above me. Hereon, if there is a such an event (child marriage), the police won’t come to your house. I promise this to you.”
Chauhan may have won from the Pali seat but girls and women lost.
5. Dividing citizens into separate classes
One of the amazing thing about the Indian constitution is that it promises us the right to equality irrespective of gender, language, caste and religion. The state is not allowed to discriminate among the citizens based on any such differences. However, it appears that the BJP is not really a fan of this feature.
Union Minister Maneka Gandhi, addressing a rally in Pilibhit, told people —Muslims— that she is going to win this election, with or without their votes. She carefully added that in the event that they do not vote for her, she will not give them jobs (lol because everyone else got so many jobs under the Modi govt) and will not work for her.
Maneka GandhiUnion Minister Maneka Gandhi (Photo: Facebook)
In another rally, she further told people, in detail,  how villages will be categorisedaccording to the share of people that voted for the BJP. ‘A’ grade for villages from where 80% of the votes are cast for the BJP; B category villages where 60% of the vote share goes to the BJP; C category for villages where 50% votes go to the BJP; and D category for the rest.
Moreover, she said that development work in these villages will be prioritised in A villages, followed by B,C and D respectively.
6. Ethnic cleansing (or genocide)
This is not a bogeyman. The BJP government at the centre brought in the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2016 that is prima facie discriminatory against Muslims and other religions. It seeks to provide citizenship to  “illegal migrants” from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan, who are of Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi or Christian extraction only. The bill, thankfully, did not pass in the Rajya Sabha. Right now, the definition of “illegal migrants” in the Citizenship Act, 1955 does not discriminate against Muslims.
The implementation of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam, as it has been pointed out, inherently discriminates against linguistic, religious and ethnic minorities. Around 40 lakh people were left out of the first NRC draft, many of whom have lived in Assam for generations but don’t have official documents dating back to 1971 to prove their citizenship.
Amit Shah has referred to these people —mostly ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities — as ‘infiltrators’ and ‘termites’, following in the footsteps of one Adolf Hitler who referred to Jewish people as ‘cockroaches’ before he went ahead and killed at least 6 million jews and launched a war that killed many more people.
Recently, Amit Shah said that after coming back to power, they will implement NRC in the entire country. to remove “every single infiltrator” except Buddhas, Hindus and Sikhs.

Thursday, August 9, 2018

Whitewashing India's Religious Freedom

 Whitewashing India's Religious Freedom

India has an impeccable history of welcoming the stranger and giving refuge to the oppressed, rejected and the evicted. She has welcomed Jews, Christians, Zoroastrians and the Baha’is. Indeed the very first mosque built outside of Arabia was in India by a Hindu King in the state of Malabar. The Tibetan Buddhist refugees found a home in India; the Ahmadiyya Muslims felt secure, so were the displaced Bangladeshi and Afghan refugees.

This beautiful pluralistic 5000-year-old tradition of India is in peril now. BJP and its affiliates (The Sangh Parivar) that govern India "currently" are hell-bent on destroying that heritage. They want to force non-Hindus into obedience and tell them what they can eat or believe, and whom they can marry or live as 2nd class citizens. They want to free India from Christians and Muslims, and plan to convert them by 2025 to Hinduism.  Indeed, the ISIS had given similar options to the Christians and Yazidis. 

Make no mistake about it; Hinduism is a religion of peace like all other religions. The problem is not between people of faith, but the radicals.

A few Indian American organizations linked to the Sangh Parivar want to whitewash the situation. They want to portray that everything is hunky dory in India.  

Hunky dory it is not, the  Congressmen and Senators are fully conversant of the harassment, lynching, raping and killing of Christians, Dalits, Muslims, Sikhs, Atheists and others in India. 

It is time for the Indian Americans to save the honor of India and restore her pluralistic heritage that got derailed in the last four years. 

The prosperity of a nation stands on her two firm legs; economic growth and social cohesion, one will not sustain without the other.   

 If the minorities continue to live in apprehension and fear, the whole nation gets engaged in useless battles and the prosperity will come to a grinding halt, and the country will limp until it reaches a new life or loses all that was achieved.  

The confidence of foreign investments in a nation spurs the growth, India’s IT industry,  call centers, and businesses have raised the standard of living for many. As long as the investors feel secure about their investments they will pump in more funds. However, when they see chaos emerging with the nations discriminative practices, harassment, lynching, rapes and killing of the minorities, they will pull out and everyone stands to lose.

It was embarrassing to note the missing presence of India at the religious freedom conference held by the Department of State in July 2018. If the violations continue, India may get stamped as a "Country of Particular Concern” for violations of religious freedom. It will hurt India, particularly the business community and the information technology sector. 

The whitewash report produced by the Hindu America Foundation is understandable. No Indian wants India to lose, but neither should we compromise on the truth to look good. We hope to produce an accurate state of the union; after all, India's emblem includes the phrase, Satyameva Jayate - Truth triumphs.

The majority of Indians of all faiths believe in Pluralism, i.e., respecting the otherness of other.  It is not Hindus either,  but the radicals among Hindus that are causing the problems with the subtle encouragement from the BJP government.




Quotes from the HAF, reported by Jha;

"The Indian government provides "unprecedented" religious accommodations to its religious minority population, says a report by a US-based Hindu advocacy group." 

The truth is far from it. It sounds like the majority is doing a favor to the minorities in 'accommodating' them.  It is like saying "we give equal rights to women" who the hell are we to give them their rights, to begin with, the rights were theirs.  Indeed, every Indian is guaranteed those rights; we are all equal citizens. No one has more privileges than the other. 

"To bring greater stability to the region and prevent the growth of radical Islamist and Communist/Maoist terrorism." This statement is too hypocritical and divisive to exclude radical Hindutva terrorism from the list.  The issue is not with Hindus or Muslims; it is with radicals among them. 

"Overall, it seeks to show the broader story of religious freedom and pluralism in India, which is often not, reflected in the media or US policy circles." Indeed, India was a pluralist nation until the Hindutva brigade took over the country four years ago.  

We need to come together and appeal to the Government of India, to issue visas to the commissioners of the USCIRF to investigate the Sikh Genocide, Massacre of Muslims in Gujarat, killing of Christians, Rapes, and lynching of Dalits, and harassment of Sikhs. If the commission gives a clean certificate, it will help boost the investor confidence in India; on the other hand, if India's record is of particular concern, then it is time to fix it than pretending to be holier than thou.  

I would appeal to the Hindu America Foundation to issue press releases condemning the lynching of Muslims, killing of Christians, harassment of Dalits, and Atheists, by condemning each event, it will give them the credibility to be a legitimate pluralist organization for Human rights. 

We will also write a letter urging Prime Minister Modi to speak out forcefully against harassment of any Indian and pledge that no Indian has more privileges than the other. Ambassador Sam Brownback says, if evil acts get condemned as they occur, they will be choked and will not see the light of the day. 

Finding solutions video in Hindi-Urdu Language
https://www.facebook.com/100001262335435/posts/1998170193568372/
Mike Ghouse, is president of the Center for Pluralism and is committed to fostering cohesive societies where no human has to live in apprehension or fear of the other. His India Blog is http://MikeGhouseforIndia.blogspot.com 

Published in the following News agencies:

https://www.theindianpanorama.news/featured/whitewashing-indias-religious-freedom/


https://www.4conservative.com/countercurrents.org/whitewashing-indias-religious-freedom/

http://muslimmirror.com/eng/whitewashing-indias-religious-freedom/


https://countercurrents.org/2018/08/10/whitewashing-indias-religious-freedom/


https://www.thekashmirmonitor.net/whitewashing-religious-freedom/


Whitewash pieces

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/india-provides-unprecedented-accommodation-to-its-religious-minority-population-report/articleshow/65182770.cms

https://www.lalitkjha.com/apex/f?p=24257:170:::NO:170:P170_ARTICLE_NUM:30416

http://www.indiawest.com/news/global_indian/hindu-american-foundation-holds-briefing-highlighting-india-s-democracy-in/article_d15dfba6-9a8b-11e8-9a64-93691e1ac7da.html



Sunday, June 3, 2018

Voters Now Know Modi-Shah

Thanks to Harbans Mukhia and the Wire for presenting one of the most hopeful articles based on reality. 
Voters Now Know Modi-Shah Aren't the Masters of Statecraft They Claimed to Be

In the closed-door meetings, Modi and Shah 'may' have laughed their guts out,  " Dekho hum ne en Hinduoon ko kaisay chootiya banaya, Daliton, easaw-iyoon aur Musalmanon ko kaise dara ke rakha hai? Salon ko ladao, aur apna ullu theek karo." Look, how we made assesses out of Hindus and frightened the crap out of Dalits, Christians, and Muslims. Let's make fools out of them and get us what we want.

George Bush had famously said, you can fool someone, once or twice but not all the times. Indians have finally risen, they will not be fooled in 2019 so that these two bigots can have a laugh at them.

"
The BJP-Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh combine had worked out an invincible formula: wild promises in the name of Vikas (development) at the macro level; and keeping alive innumerable micro-level communal fires on the ground."

I hope the majority of Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, and others carry ready to film mobile phones and instantly report to the news agencies, not Modi news, but Indian news agencies who are not sold outs.  I urge the media to open up their resources to showcase what people see on the ground.

If BJP wants to win, let them win fair and square and not by intimidating or communalizing. Let the Election Commission put a stop to this nonsense. 


Get your camera ready, show to the world, we the people, care about genuine Vikas, that is food on the table, education, housing and jobs.... not a temple, gurdwara, mosque or a church, that won't give us a better life.  Let every Indian has an opportunity to achieve his or her dream without hindrance. 

Mike Ghouse is committed to cohesive societies, where no human has to live in apprehension or fear of the other.

# # #
 

Voters Now Know Modi-Shah Aren't the Masters of Statecraft They Claimed to Be


Courtesy: The Wire


For the nth time, both the ruling party and the opposition are being reminded that Indian voters are not to be taken for granted.

A striking change in the country’s political discourse seems to have been evolving over the past few weeks; now, with the by-election results out, it is writ large on the wall for everyone to see. The change is from “Can the opposition parties survive the Narendra Modi-Amit Shah onslaught in 2019?” to “Can the Bharatiya Janata Party survive the challenge to it from a single or united opposition platform?” In some ways, this is a great compliment to the vibrancy of Indian democracy, which has forever let it out not to take the Indian voter for granted. The message is there once again, for the nth time, for both the BJP and the opposition.

The BJP-Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh combine had worked out an invincible formula: wild promises in the name of vikas (development) at the macro level; and keeping alive innumerable micro-level communal fires on the ground. The formula was seen to be working for about three of the four years of the Modi-Shah regime, reinforcing the duo’s self-belief in the mastery of statecraft. Their lampooning of the past 70 years, “Kuchh nahin hua (Nothing has happened)”, was meant to impress on everyone this new departure in statecraft. A new era had dawned for Indian politics, which was unlike any other since independence.

The ‘vikas’ jumla 

The flaws in this strategy are now coming home to roost. Wild promises always boomerang on the promise maker. All the absurd assurances handed out in strident voice accompanying second-rate theatrics by Modi during the election campaign in 2013-14 are now being played out on social media in video clips to the BJP leaders as reminders; the joke is now on them. What if these get played on impromptu screens by opposition parties in their election campaigns for 2019? No repetition of their words by their opponents has the same impact as the audio-visual original clip has. Shah has also greatly aided the opposition by announcing that the promise of Rs 15 lakhs to every Indian citizen’s account was a jumla; consequently, ‘jumla baaz sarkar‘ has become the sticker on every new promise that Modi is throwing at the crowd. The second sticker is on incessant lying: jhuth ki sarkar.

The formula had a modicum of chance of working had Modi been able to fulfil any of even his not-so-wild promises – price control, help to farmers, some visible growth in jobs, controlling corruption, widening the circle and quality of education and health – most of which are within the realm of the possible, at least in part. But his performance on all of these scores is pitiful. Comparisons with the much-reviled UPA regime are now surfacing – to the detriment of Modi.

Divide and rule
It is understandable that Modi-Shah should avoid reference to vikas since last year, especially after the disastrous demonetisation. In the recent elections around the country, they have fallen back exclusively on the second string of their new statecraft: divide and rule. The dividend it paid them in Uttar Pradesh was overwhelming. It also follows, then, that the dividend that is now being withdrawn is also most dramatic in the recent UP by-polls, though this is largely true elsewhere as well. The message embedded in BJP’s defeats in the Hindutva heartland like Gorakhpur and Kairana (and not to forget Phulpur) could not have been delivered more vociferously.

The opposition parties have also taken care on two counts: the realisation that electoral arithmetic is dead set against any single party including the BJP (remember 31% vote share in 2014) and therefore combining votes is the only open option; and to focus their campaign not on the agenda set by the BJP but on the everyday problems of the people, especially farmers and the youth. In other words, the agenda should be set not by the leaders but by the people. And in the end, people’s problems consist of earning their livelihood and moving on with their lives; looking into their neighbours’ kitchens does not fill their bellies.

Like this, the agenda the BJP-RSS had set is being set aside. Life is resurfacing to assert its supremacy over divisive strategies. Interestingly, massive help from the electronic and print media, the mainstay of the new statecraft, so decisive in 2014, too has fallen prey to the inevitable rule of diminishing returns. It is fair to say that the media too has had some honourable exceptions. Once again, life asserting itself over fakery.

Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi, Sonia Gandhi, Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee, BSP’s Mayawati, SP’s Akhilesh Yadav, CPI(M)’s Sitaram Yechury, Kerala CM Pinarayi Vijayan and Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal, and others attend Karnataka CM H.D. Kumaraswamy’s swearing in. Credit: PTI/Shailendra Bhojak
Modi-Shah will now hold forth on how opportunistic and unprincipled the opposition is in seeking to form a joint front against the BJP and seeking to make the forthcoming battle entirely presidential with the powerful TINA slogan. That is, if in desperation it does not launch massive communal conflagration à la 2002 or pick a tiff with Pakistan to drown out all other agenda. While several leaders like Mayawati have been warning people on these counts for over a year now, it is interesting how the same fears were expressed by the most ordinary villagers of Kairana, to at least NDTV reporters on camera after the poll results on May 31.

However loudly the BJP debaters on TV channels might shout, the elections in India have mostly been non-presidential. That is, people go to the polling booth to elect an MP and not the prime minister. It took the presidential format once when Indira Gandhi swamped the opposition in 1971 and again when Modi did it in 2014. No other election was won in the name of one supreme leader. After that presidential form of election, Gandhi had to bite the dust in 1977; let us see what happens in 2019. But the TINA factor has never worked twice. Besides, 2004 is an outstanding example of TINA’s grossest failure.

After a very successful term, the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government had a media-hyped India Shining record, with a young and dynamic Pramod Mahajan organising an army of even younger computer wizards at his beck and call, with the caste, religious and economic break up of every single constituency available in the BJP election war room, with a ‘world statesman’ Vajpayee, assisted by ‘lauh purush’ Advani, visible on every TV screen day in and day out, with the opposition in a shambles, with Sonia Gandhi’s candidature compromised by her foreign origin because of which many stalwart Congressmen had parted company, India still did not vote for a prime minister but for MPs from whom to choose the prime minister. And one who emerged prime minister, Manmohan Singh, was the least like a “president”. He ruled for ten long years.

Therefore, much as the BJP will try to pitch its campaign on the TINA factor in the absence of any other, it would be a fraught campaign.

The second, communal option is becoming less and less dividend-paying, and this has been established several times over in the last four years. First Delhi and then Bihar were the early warning signs. Recent election results from across the country have reinforced those signs.

Of course, hearing BJP leaders condemning opposition alliances as unprincipled and opportunistic would be great fun. Some amusement is welcome in these times of great tension.

Harbans Mukhia was a teacher of history at JNU.

Saturday, May 19, 2018

Congratulations to Kannadigas and Indians

Congratulations to all the 62 Million Kannadigas and 1.25 Billion Indians! Thank God for restoring Dharma through the institution of Supreme Court of India. Congratulations also go out to the BJP Leader, Mr. Yedyurappa for his decency and respecting people's choice.

Let's make sure the ones who lost the elections are not looked down, made fun of or ridiculed. If we do that, there will be a Trump around who is ready to capitalize the situation and will earn their loyalty and sympathy, and possibly flip the situation. Let's look for sustainable governance and have programs for making friends with those who are opposed. The more we include, the greater the sustainability.

Mother Teresa had said, if you want to make peace with your enemies (or perceived enemies), go talk with them. Talking among friends will not change the equation. Bhagavad Gita has expressed similar wisdom, and of course, Quran says, if you treat your enemies with respect and dignity, there is a chance of them becoming your allies in building harmony and peace.

It is the most critical time to build relationships, to reign in on the temptations to celebrate the loss of BJP, we should befriend them, in the end, and we all have to work together.

I am politically independent.

Mike Ghouse  

Saturday, April 28, 2018

Fifth Column: Hindutva and Muslims by Tavleen Singh

This a good write up that will lead to the conflicting parties understand each other, a good step towards reconciliation. 

Courtesy - Indian Express
Fifth Column: Hindutva and Muslims

I despise this new Hindutva because it has unleashed upon India a species of upper caste, Hindu Indian whose DNA seems made up entirely of ancient hatreds, grievances and a very ancient inferiority complex.

Written by Tavleen Singh | Updated: April 29, 2018 12:29:18 am
fifth column: Hindutva and MuslimsThe world, when viewed through the warped lens of this Hindutva, makes even something as horrific and sickening as the rape of little girls into a Hindu-Muslim issue. (Illustration by: C R Sasikumar)
If you have read this column more than once you will find this disclaimer unnecessary but here goes. I despise Hindutva. By this I mean the Hindutva we have seen since Narendra Modi became prime minister, not the original version. I despise this new Hindutva because it has unleashed upon India a species of upper caste, Hindu Indian whose DNA seems made up entirely of ancient hatreds, grievances and a very ancient inferiority complex.
Indians of this species always existed but a powerful BJP Prime Minister and the spread of social media have emboldened them to emerge from the shadows into the harsh light of the public square. The ‘values’ on which this species of Indian bases his faith and nationalism are these. Islam is an evil religion, all Muslims are jihadists, secularism is sickularism, liberals are anti-national and Hindustan must be for Hindus. People of other faiths can stay in this ‘new India’ only if they accept subservience.
The world, when viewed through the warped lens of this Hindutva, makes even something as horrific and sickening as the rape of little girls into a Hindu-Muslim issue. Hindutva warriors tweet hatred on Twitter almost every minute of every day, but when there is a trigger, they tweet up a tsunami. We saw this after the rape of that little girl in the temple in Kathua. And, last week the trigger was Salman Khurshid’s brave admission that the Congress party had Muslim blood on its hands. It does. And the list of massacres in secular Congress decades is long and saddening. But, what no Congress leader will ever admit is that it was our oldest political party’s twisted secularism that gave birth to Hindutva as we know it today.
Sonia Gandhi recently justified her son’s spate of very publicised visits to temples and the equally publicised news that he is a Shiva bhakt who wears the sacred thread of baptised Hindus. She said it was to rectify the false impression created by the BJP that the Congress had become a ‘Muslim party’. She seems to have forgotten the many occasions on which in the name of secularism Congress prime ministers have gone out of their way to play to the Muslim gallery.
Rajiv Gandhi changed the law to deprive divorced Muslim women the right to maintenance and it was because he gave Muslims the right to use Shariat rules in domestic matters that Hindus supported L K Advani’s chariot excursion to Ayodhya. It was his slogan of ‘One constitution, one law’ that resonated more than the promise of a temple to Ram where the Babri Masjid then stood. If that is ancient history from a time when Soniaji was not yet a politician, then she could do well to remember that her chosen prime minister said clearly during his second tenure that Muslims had first right on India’s resources.
At the 52nd meeting of the National Development Council, he said, “We will have to devise innovative plans to ensure that minorities, particularly the Muslim minority, are empowered to share equitably the fruits of development. These must have the first claim on resources.” During the good doctor’s second term in office, when Rahul Gandhi became the Congress party’s heir-apparent, WikiLeaks reported Rahul telling an American ambassador that he was more troubled by Hindu terrorism than the jihadi kind.
The truth is that none of these things was ‘appeasement’ as Hindutva hysterics like to call it. Real appeasement would have been if the Indian State had done something to help Muslim communities economically. If more jobs had been created for skilled Muslim craftsmen, more schools for Muslim girls and more basic amenities like clean water and electricity. On a long drive through rural Bihar two weeks ago, I found that nearly every time I saw a desperately poor village built of thatch and mud, it turned out to be a Muslim village. So if Modi had stuck to his promise of ‘parivartan’ and ‘vikas’, I personally have no doubt at all that in 2019 Muslims would have voted for the BJP in states like Uttar Pradesh and Bihar where there really are Muslim vote banks that make a real difference.
It is Modi’s misfortune that he failed to notice that along with big failures in the area of healthcare and education, one of the biggest failures of decades of Congress rule was its treatment of Muslim communities. Instead of giving them what they really needed, ‘secular’ Congress prime ministers gave them the sort of tokenism that made them a target for Hindutva rage. If Muslims still believe that they prefer to trust the Congress and not the BJP, it is because Congress prime ministers did not permit cabinet ministers to spew hatred and venom. Several senior ministers in Modi’s government have done this unrestrained. A small difference maybe but a difference it is.
Follow Tavleen Singh on Twitter @ tavleen_singh
For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App
More From Tavleen Singh