HOME | ABOUT US | www.MikeGhouse.net Google Profile | C.V. | Interfaith Speaker | Muslim Speaker |Motivational Speaker | Americans Together | Videos | Please note that the blog posts include my own articles plus selected articles critical to India's cohesive functioning. I wish I could have them all, but will have to live with a few. My articles are exclusively published at www.TheGhouseDiary.com

Friday, April 17, 2009

One God, Multiple Gods or No God

RELIGION COMMUNICATORS COUNCIL HONORS THREE DALLASITES.Mike Ghouse accepts the recognition with humility.

Mike's 5 Minutes Speech at the event

As religious communicators we need to explore and communicate that God has not signed up a deal with any religion behind our back, he just cannot do that. Let’s honor every tradition and faith whether they believe in one, multiple or no God. The essence of the creator and causer of the universe does not change with our beliefs.Let’s learn to accept the otherness of other and respect the God given uniqueness of each one of the 7 billion of us, then conflicts fade and solutions emerge.

Continued: http://mikeghouseforamerica.blogspot.com/2009/04/mike-ghouse-honored-by-rcc.html

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

The Hindu Rate of Wrath

The Hindu Rate of Wrath

The article by Francois Gauthier appended below prompts me to write the following comment;

Good things begin with me, you and each one of us. Let our words, actions and thoughts be directed towards finding solutions and not blaming any one. Blaming has never produced any sustainable goodness. The more you blame the deeper the problem becomes.

We need to think in terms of Indians, we are all the same breed no matter what religion we wear; that is pure diversity. When there is a problem with any one of us - our first response should be it is “our” problem, and our aptitude should be, that we need to find solutions for all of us to “co-exist”. No one will live peacefully when other isn’t. It is in our interest to seek to mitigate conflicts and nurture goodwill.

If my mind in not clean, I cannot expect others' minds to be clean either. If I express anger or ill-will towards others, why shouldn't they do the same?

The writer Francois Gautier certainly has stated some facts; like India never invaded another country; Hinduism is about diversity, but then he adds some fiction to it. Among other things, he says no Muslim was killed vs. Hindus were killed, he needs to get this facts straight. He can fool the French, not us the Indians. In any clash, be it between Tamils and Kannadigas, Marathas and other Indians, Hindus or Muslims, Jharkand or some Gadh..... Shamefully people get killed in clashes. Yes, they are all Indians no matter what they believe. He feeds on praises lavished on him for promoting hatred. We should discourage any one that divides us Indians... our goal should be to mitigate the differences and not enhance them.

The British were masters in dividing and ruling us, now, he seems to be subtly doing that. Any one who promotes ill-will towards each other is no good. I doubt it if he is getting paid to feed the ego’s of a few who are bent on dividing us. We should not give any one the power to make us hate others.

At least if you and I have clean decent minds, that is two less problem makers in India. Let's find solutions without score keeping.
Mike Ghouse

# # #

The Hindu Rate of Wrath

When the Mahatma's cowards erupt in fury, it hurts. It isn't terror.
Francois Gautier

Is there such a thing as 'Hindu terrorism', as the arrest of Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur for the20recent Malegaon blasts may tend to prove? Well, I guess I was asked to write this column because I am one of that rare breed of foreign correspondents-a lover of Hindus! A born Frenchman, Catholic-educated and non-Hindu, I do hope I'll be given some credit for my opinions, which are not the product of my parents' ideas, my education or my atavism, but garnered from 25 years of reporting in South Asia (for Le Journal de Geneve andLe Figaro).

In the early 1980s, when I started freelancing in south India , doing photo features on kalaripayattu, the Ayyappa festival, or the Ayyanars, I slowly realised that the genius of this country lies in its Hindu ethos, in the true spirituality behind Hinduism. The average Hindu you meet in a million villages possesses this simple, innate spirituality and accepts your diversity, whether you are Christian or Muslim, Jain or Arab, French or Chinese. It is this Hinduness that makes the Indian Christian different from, say, a French Christian, or the Indian Muslim unlike a Saudi Muslim. I also learnt that Hindus not only believed that the divine could manifest itself at different times, under different names, using different scriptures (not to mention the wonderful avatar concept, the perfect answer to 21st century religious strife)20but that they had also given refuge to persecuted minorities from across the world-Syrian Christians, Parsis, Jews, Armenians, and today, Tibetans. In 3,500 years of existence, Hindus have never militarily invaded another country, never tried to impose their religion on others by force or induced conversions.

You cannot find anybody less fundamentalist than a Hindu in the world and it saddens me when I see the Indian and western press equating terrorist groups like SIMI, which blow up innocent civilians, with ordinary, angry Hindus who burn churches without killing anybody. We know also that most of these communal incidents often involve persons from the same groups-often Dalits and tribals-some of who have converted to Christianity and others not.

However reprehensible the destruction of Babri Masjid, no Muslim was killed in the process; compare this to the 'vengeance' bombings of 1993 in Bombay , which wiped out hundreds of innocents, mostly Hindus. Yet the Babri Masjid destruction is often described by journalists as the more horrible act of the two.. We also remember how=2 0Sharad Pawar, when he was chief minister of Maharashtra in 1993, lied about a bomb that was supposed to have gone off in a Muslim locality of Bombay .

I have never been politically correct, but have always written what I have discovered while reporting. Let me then be straightforward about this so-called Hindu terror.. Hindus, since the first Arab invasions, have been at the receiving end of terrorism, whether it was by Timur, who killed 1,00,000 Hindus in a single day in 1399, or by the Portuguese Inquisition which crucified Brahmins in Goa . Today, Hindus are still being targeted: there were one million Hindus in the Kashmir valley in 1900; only a few hundred remain, the rest having fled in terror. Blasts after blasts have killed hundreds of innocent Hindus all over India in the last four years. Hindus, the overwhelming majority community of this country, are being made fun of, are despised, are deprived of the most basic facilities for one of their most sacred pilgrimages in Amarnath while their government heavily sponsors the Haj. They see their brothers and sisters converted to Christianity through inducements and financial traps, see a harmless 84-year-old swami and a sadhvi brutally murdered.. Their gods are blasphemed.

So sometimes, enough is enough. At some point, after years or even centuries of submitting like sheep to slaughter, Hindus-whom the Mahatma once gently called cowards-erupt in uncontrolled fury. And it hurts badly. It happened in Gujarat . It happened in Jammu , then in Kandhamal, Mangalore, and Malegaon . It may happen again elsewhere. What should be understood is that this is a spontaneous revolution on the ground, by ordinary Hindus, without any planning from the political leadership. Therefore, the BJP, instead of acting embarrassed, should not disown those who choose other means to let their anguished voices be heard.

There are about a billion Hindus, one in every six persons on this planet. They form one of the most successful, law-abiding and integrated communities in the world today. Can you call them terrorists?
(The writer is the editor-in-chief of the Paris-based La Revue de l'Inde.)